What if the most powerful force in the universe is not gravity, not time, not even energy—but love? Not love as poetry describes it. Not love as emotion alone. But love as something fundamental, structural, and real—as real as space, time, and matter itself. What if love is not a byproduct of existence, but the very reason existence exists at all? For most of human history, love has been treated as something deeply personal, subjective, and emotional. Science measures forces that can be observed, quantified, and repeated. Love, on the surface, seems to belong outside that framework. Yet in Life in 24 Dimensions, a convincing and logical case is made for something radical: love is not only real—it may be the most real force in the universe. To understand this idea, we must first rethink what we mean by “real.” In the book, reality is not defined by what feels solid or visible. Physical matter, despite how permanent it appears, is constantly changing. At the deepest levels of physics, particles appear and disappear, matter transforms into energy, and even time itself is relative. Nothing physical remains unchanged forever. If permanence is a requirement for ultimate reality, then the physical universe alone cannot qualify.

This leads to a powerful distinction introduced in the book: Ultimate TRUTH versus Relative Truth. Ultimate TRUTH is something that does not change, does not depend on belief, and remains true under all conditions. Relative truths are useful and functional, but they hold only within certain limits. Much of what we call “reality” falls into the second category. So where does love fit? The book proposes that non-physical reality—thoughts, emotions, consciousness—is not secondary or imaginary. We experience thoughts and emotions every waking moment. They shape our decisions, our behavior, our relationships, and even our physical health. To dismiss them as less real simply because they are not material is a mistake born from an incomplete view of reality. This is where dimensional thinking becomes essential. In Life in 24 Dimensions, reality is described as consisting of twelve physical dimensions and twelve non-physical dimensions, working together as a unified whole. Physical dimensions explain space, time, and material processes. Non-physical dimensions explain consciousness, thought, emotion, choice, and meaning. Neither set is complete on its own. Reality only makes sense when both are considered together.

Within this framework, emotions are not random byproducts of biology. They are non-physical forces that interact with physical reality. Among all emotions, love stands apart. Love, as described in the book, is not simply affection or attachment. It is unconditional. It does not depend on circumstances, reward, or outcome. It does not arise from fear, lack, or desire. Instead, it is creative, expansive, and unifying. It brings things together rather than dividing them. It builds rather than destroys. Fear, by contrast, is shown to be inherently divisive. Fear fragments perception, fuels conflict, and creates separation—between people, belief systems, and even within ourselves. Much of the suffering in the world, the book argues, stems from fear-driven thinking rather than truth-driven understanding. This brings us to one of the book’s most meaningful claims: God is real, and unconditional love is the defining characteristic of God. Rather than placing God outside the universe as a distant observer, the book logically places God at the foundation of all dimensions—physical and non-physical. God is not bound by space or time. God is not subject to change. In terms of Ultimate TRUTH, this makes sense: something eternal must exist outside of all relative conditions.

In this framework, love is not something God “does.” Love is what God is. From this perspective, existence itself begins as an act of love. Sentient beings are created not out of need or deficiency, but out of love’s desire to share itself. Consciousness is not accidental. Meaning is not imposed later. Purpose is woven into reality from the very beginning. This understanding also reframes the nature of human existence. If you are not only a physical body—but a conscious being existing across non-physical dimensions—then death is not annihilation. The body changes, but consciousness does not depend on the body to exist. Just as energy does not disappear but changes form, consciousness continues beyond physical limitation.

Love plays a crucial role here as well. Love is what connects consciousness across dimensions. It is what gives continuity, coherence, and meaning to experience. It is not erased by death because it does not belong to the physical world in the first place. This idea is not presented as blind faith. The author does not ask the reader to abandon logic or science. On the contrary, the entire argument is built step by step using reason, observation, and consistency. The scientific method is respected. Logic is central. The difference lies in what is allowed into the discussion. When non-physical reality is excluded, the picture of existence is incomplete. When it is included, love emerges not as a sentimental concept, but as a structural necessity.